Wednesday, November 16, 2011

War on Young Girls and on Science

Most of the GOP presidential candidates desire to COERCE YOUNG GIRLS into a lifetime of hardship. They seek the power to dictate to victims of rape and incest: Live with it!

To you who turn a blind mind on this WAR on YOUNG GIRLS: you are UNLEASHING MONSTERS upon helpless innocents.

This war on young girls is also a WAR on SCIENCE.

“I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” – Thomas Jefferson

The zygote has no brain activity, the criterion for human life. It has no brain. It is not sentient. It does not breathe. Whereas, the pregnant girl is an actual living human being. Yet, the pro-zygote, who tout “All life!”, blank out the life of a pregnant girl.

Envision a young orphan who gets pregnant and is abandoned by her boyfriend. She would not be able to afford daycare, yet she would have to earn a living. Evading the distinction between a zygote and a baby, the cavalier say, “Put the baby up for adoption.” They evince their monstrous cruelty: they do not care that giving up one’s baby is 24-7 torture for a lifetime.

Imagine a victim of incest, her mom and her rapist standing over her, saying, “Abortion is a sin.” Think of a rape victim who is forced to birth. She works part-time, goes to school, and takes care of the baby. She goes to a grocery store with her baby, and a man accidentally bumps into her slightly. As she freezes with fear and loathing, the baby innocently smiles at her, and for a moment, she feels hatred for her baby. At home as she breastfeeds, hatred for herself overwhelms her for that moment when she hated her baby, coupled with a wrenching dread that she will experience such moments again.

What kind creates fallible beings with sexual urges, even the young ones, and punishes them for a lifetime for making mistakes? What kind furthers the pain of rape victims? The CRUEL kind. The MALEVOLENT.

What kind gives legal coercive power to those who war on young girls and on science?

190 comments:

Ilyn Ross said...

One's personal stand on anything is no one's business, but those who LUST TO IMPOSE must be fought.

I am pro-life and pro-choice. They are not contradictory. The embryo has no brain activity, so it is not yet an actual living human being; hence, it has no rights. An embryo is up to 8 weeks. The central nervous system [CNS] is fully formed at 9 weeks. The fetus takes its first breath at 10 weeks. I hold that at this stage, the unborn is an actual living human being, thus, has rights.

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1268872285695.139307.1346466773&type=3#!/photo.php?fbid=2584404573180&set=a.1268872285695.139307.1346466773&type=3&theater

Tom Anderson said...

I wouldn't describe the effort to protect the lives of the unborn exactly as "a war against young girls." Strikes me as completely over the top and inaccurate, because of two things: women are as capable of having children as "young girls" (until menopause) and it is not agreed among all citizens when exactly to mark the beginning of human life as a person.

I agree with you that a woman's right to choose is the issue and must be protected legally, but let's not hide the fact that an abortion does destroy a human life.

Two questions here: when does a human life become a legal person, and does the state ever have the right to invade legally a person's body to enforce law?

Unfortunately there are plenty of precedents of law invading a person's body to dictate what he can and cannot do to it.

The first beachhead to gain is the principle that a person owns his own body and therefore the state has no right to abridge that right by telling him (or her), for example, what substances he ingests or what sort of sex he wants.

As it stands, the abortion debate is spun without context, as if a person's body does not have to be taken over by the state in order to "protect" the fetus.

This is an easier notion for people to understand, than the "metaphysical" issue of when a baby's life becomes a legal person, and thus deserving of government protection.

Historybuffy said...

Your argument doesn't focus on the big picture. How would a woman in that situation have a safe abortion even if she decided not to keep the baby? I don't think legalizing abortion would change the minds of the people in your scenario a bit. It'd be the same situation. I do see your point though. Isn't the idea that the government can say what directions our lives take, what procedures we have done, what we can eat, smoke, who we can screw (with the exception of pedophilia and bestiality), and what kind of currency we can use like the idea of them owning us? Defiantly not something that the founding fathers, certainly not Jefferson or Paine, would agree with. I agree with your idea of being both pro-life and pro-choice. Congress can just stay OUT of my womb, thank you.

Ilyn Ross said...

"At the very heart of our American conservatism is the conviction that the princi...ples embodied in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are uniquely powerful, foundational, and defining." - Mitt Romney

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Freedom-Outside-of-Work-Marilyn-Tagocon-v-JP-Morgan-Chase/207875672581275#!/photo.php?fbid=10150564864861121&set=a.161403756120.123284.21392801120&type=1&theater

Ilyn Ross said...

Ilyn Ross http://brainmind.com/FetalBrainDevelopment.html

The human brainstem is fashioned around the 7th week of gestation and matures in a caudal to rostral arc thereby forming the medulla, pons, and midbrain. The medulla mediates arousal, breathing, heart rate, and gross movement of the body and head, and medullary functions appear prior to those of the pons which precede those of the midbrain. Hence, by the 9th gestational week the fetus will display spontaneous movements, one week later takes its FIRST BREATH...

Ilyn Ross said...

When the Unborn Human Being Acquires Rights

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2010/11/when-unborn-human-being-acquires-rights.html

Ilyn Ross said...

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2011/11/war-on-young-girls-and-on-science.html

With female Independents in swing states, Romney trails Obama by 18 points. This is due to the religion-based war on science.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/07/romney-hones-his-appeal-to-women-voters/

Ilyn Ross said...

What kind creates fallible beings with sexual urges, even the young ones, and punishes them for a lifetime for making mistakes? What kind furthers the pain of rape victims? The CRUEL kind. The MALEVOLENT.

The embryonic stage evinces that God is not malevolent. This stage is the window to change course.

Ilyn Ross said...

‎"The Court divided the pregnancy period into three trimesters. During the first trimester, the decision to terminate the pregnancy was solely at the discretion of the woman. After the first trimester, the state could “regulate procedure.” During the second trimester, the state could regulate (but not outlaw) abortions in the interests of the mother’s health. After the second trimester, the fetus became viable, and the state could regulate or outlaw abortions in the interest of the potential life except when necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother."

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/roe_v._wade_1973

Ilyn Ross said...

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/prenatal-care/PR00112

Week 6: The neural tube closes

Fetal development four weeks after conception - Growth is rapid this week. Just four weeks after conception, the neural tube along your baby's back is closing and your baby's heart is pumping blood.

Ilyn Ross said...

What kind creates fallible beings with sexual urges, even the young ones, and punishes them for a lifetime for making mistakes? What kind furthers the pain of rape victims? The CRUEL kind. The MALEVOLENT.

My God is all-good and all-loving. He always gives a window to change course. In a pregnancy, that is the embryonic stage.

Ilyn Ross said...

The GOP desire to COERCE YOUNG GIRLS into a lifetime of hardship. They seek the power to dictate to victims of rape and incest: Live with it!

One GOP 2012 senatorial candidate said that a female's body can prevent pregnancy when raped, and another said rape is his god's will. Such irrational, ungodly, evil, candidates.

Life begins at conception = The sun revolves around the Earth. The all-good and all-loving God, as evinced by science, gives a window to change course, so that those who make mistakes do not have to pay for the rest of their lives, so that rape/incest victims do not go through hell forever. The embryo is not sentient, not breathing, and does not have brain activity. The unborn takes its FIRST breath at 10 weeks.

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2011/11/war-on-young-girls-and-on-science.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Opposition to abortion except in cases of rape or incest flouts justice. It is wrong to punish an offspring for the crime of the father.

The mom has a choice, whether the pregnancy is due to her mistake or to rape, until the unborn has brain activity.

Ilyn Ross said...

http://brainmind.com/FetalBrainDevelopment.html

The human brainstem is fashioned around the 7th week of gestation and matures in a caudal to rostral arc thereby forming the medulla, pons, and midbrain. The medulla mediates arousal, breathing, heart rate, and gross movement of the body and head, and medullary functions appear prior to those of the pons which precede those of the midbrain. Hence, by the 9th gestational week the fetus will display spontaneous movements, one week later takes its FIRST BREATH...

Ilyn Ross said...

http://www.buzzle.com/articles/brain-development-in-fetus.html

Week 9: The nervous system by now is quite developed for proper functioning.

Ilyn Ross said...

Some anti-abortionists claim that the presence of 'brain' activity in an embryo at six weeks is evidence of sentience, and therefore personhood, thus regarding its life as morally and legally significant from that moment. However, Easterbrook believes the medical evidence shows that this so-called brain 'activity' is nothing more than, 'random neuron firings as nerves connect – basically tiny spasms'. In fact, according to him it is only around the twenty-second to twenty-fourth week that the cerebral cortex becomes 'wired', and we begin to see evidence of more complex brain activity comparable to that found in newborns:

'From the twenty-second week to the twenty-fourth week, connections start to be established between the cortex and the thalamus, the part of the brain that translates thoughts into nervous-system commands. Fetal consciousness seems physically “impossible” before these connections form.' (Easterbrook G., Abortion and Brain Waves)

http://www.thatreligiousstudieswebsite.com/Ethics/Applied_Ethics/Abortion/concept_of_personhood_4.php

Ilyn Ross said...

God is all-good and all-loving, so He gave the embryonic stage as the WINDOW to CHANGE COURSE, so that those who commit mistakes do not suffer for a lifetime, together with the baby they would bear.

An embryo is up to 8 weeks. It is not sentient, it does not breathe. It cannot have brain activity because the central nervous system is not yet fully formed at this point. The unborn takes it first breath at 10 weeks.

Being pro-life and pro-choice is not contradictory.

Ilyn Ross said...

Being pro-life and pro-choice is not contradictory. Being pro-life and pro-zygote is. The zygote/embryo has no central nervous system, thus, it has no brain activity. It is not sentient; it does not breathe.

Humans are fallible; even the young have sexual urges. God has provided the embryonic stage as the window to change course. God is not malevolent nor a sadist, but the anti-choice are.

Ilyn Ross said...

FREE Will = FREE Choice. Those who spurn FREEdom, reason, and reality [e.g. the embryonic stage], spurn God's benevolence. Those who crave to impose, contrary to FREE will, are ungodly.

Ilyn Ross said...

"Aborting an embryo is murder" = "Government in bed with religion is good" = "Pursuit of happiness harms America" = "Rape/Incest is god's will" = "When raped, the body can prevent pregnancy"

Ilyn Ross said...

The embryo is not sentient. It does not breathe. It has no fully developed central nervous system; thus, it has no brain activity.

Life begins at conception = The sun revolves around the Earth. Evil.

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2011/11/war-on-young-girls-and-on-science.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Behold the evil of DARK-AGES warriors: Life begins at conception = The sun revolves around the Earth.

http://evolution.mbdojo.com/conflict.html

Ilyn Ross said...


"The Earth is firmly fixed; it shall not be moved." -Psalms 104:5

"The bible verse shackled the minds of men for thousands of years, and held back the advance of science. It was this verse that was used as evidence against Galileo, who argued for the theory of Copernicus, that the earth is not immovable, but rotates around the sun. It was for teaching this that he was called to Rome in 1633, and tried for the crime of heresy. The aged Galileo, in his 70's, was taken down into the dungeons of the church and shown the instruments of torture that were going to be used on him if he did not recant. Fearing the torture, and fearing that he might share the fate of Giordano Bruno, whom the church burned at the stake a generation earlier for the same crime, Galileo recanted the truth. He was confined to his home under house arrest, neither allowed to leave or to receive visitors, for the last seven years of his life."

http://evolution.mbdojo.com/conflict.html

Ilyn Ross said...

"Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst." - Thomas Paine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=013aa1q6QgM

Ilyn Ross said...

It is a matter of right to one's own life and happiness, right to be able to change course when one commits a mistake, right of victims of rape/incest, right not to be tyrannized by the irrational.

The embryonic stage is up to 8 weeks. The central nervous system is fully formed on the 9th week. The fetus takes its first breath at 10 weeks.

DARK-AGES warriors spurn the embryonic stage, the window provided by an all-good and all-loving God, so that those who commit mistakes, or the victims of rape/incest, can change course, if they want to.

There are tyrants; those who crave to impose their irrationality. They must be fought.

Ilyn Ross said...

One can be revived when the heart stops. It is brain activity that is the criterion for the cessation of life. It is the criterion for the onset of life.

An embryo is up to 8 weeks. It is not sentient. It does not breathe. It has no fully formed central nervous system (cns). Thus, it has no brain activity. The cns is fully developed on the 9th week. The fetus takes its first breath on the 10th week.

Ilyn Ross said...

When it has brain activity, the unborn becomes an actual living human being. That can happen only on or after the 9th week.

I am pro-life and pro-choice. They are not contradictory.

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2011/11/war-on-young-girls-and-on-science.html

Ilyn Ross said...

What kind creates fallible beings with sexual urges, even the young ones, and punishes them for a lifetime for making mistakes? What kind furthers the pain of rape victims? The CRUEL kind. The MALEVOLENT.

My God is all-good and all-loving. He always gives a window to change course. In a pregnancy, that is the embryonic stage. Every human has the right to change course when he/she makes mistakes.

Life begins at conception = The sun revolves around the Earth. The all-good and all-loving God, as evinced by science, gives a window to change course, so that those who make mistakes do not have to pay for the rest of their lives, so that rape/incest victims do not go through hell forever. The embryo is not sentient, not breathing, and does not have brain activity. The unborn takes its FIRST breath at 10 weeks.

Ilyn Ross said...

Galileo was tyrannized by DARK-AGES warriors, using the bible.

"The Earth is firmly fixed; it shall not be moved." -Psalms 104:5

"The bible verse shackled the minds of men for thousands of years, and held back the advance of science. It was this verse that was used as evidence against Galileo, who argued for the theory of Copernicus, that the earth is not immovable, but rotates around the sun. It was for teaching this that he was called to Rome in 1633, and tried for the crime of heresy. The aged Galileo, in his 70's, was taken down into the dungeons of the church and shown the instruments of torture that were going to be used on him if he did not recant. Fearing the torture, and fearing that he might share the fate of Giordano Bruno, whom the church burned at the stake a generation earlier for the same crime, Galileo recanted the truth. He was confined to his home under house arrest, neither allowed to leave or to receive visitors, for the last seven years of his life."

http://evolution.mbdojo.com/conflict.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Personhood at conception is anti reality, anti science, and DARK-AGES warrioring. It is not pro-life. It is a war on young girls and on science.

Ilyn Ross said...

One's personal stand on anything is no one's business, but those who LUST TO IMPOSE must be fought. Life begins at conception = The sun revolves around the Earth. It is anti reality, anti science, and DARK-AGES warrioring. It is not pro-life. It is a war on young girls and on science.

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2011/11/war-on-young-girls-and-on-science.html

I am pro-life and pro-choice. They are not contradictory. The embryo has no brain activity, so it is not yet an actual living human being; hence, it has no rights. An embryo is up to 8 weeks. The central nervous system [CNS] is fully formed at 9 weeks. The fetus takes its first breath at 10 weeks. I hold that at this stage, the unborn is an actual living human being, thus, has rights.

"Belief in a cruel God makes a cruel man." What kind creates fallible beings with sexual urges, even the young ones, and punishes them for a lifetime for making mistakes? What kind furthers the pain of rape victims? The CRUEL kind. The MALEVOLENT.

My God is all-good and all-loving. He always gives a window to change course. In a pregnancy, that is the embryonic stage. Every human has the right to change course when he/she makes mistakes.

Galileo was tyrannized by DARK-AGES warriors, using the bible. "The Earth is firmly fixed; it shall not be moved." -Psalms 104:5 http://evolution.mbdojo.com/conflict.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Humans are fallible; even the young have sexual urges. God has provided the embryonic stage as the window to change course. God is not malevolent nor a sadist, but the anti-choice are.

Being pro-life and pro-choice is not contradictory. Being pro-life and pro-zygote is. The zygote/embryo has no central nervous system, thus, it has no brain activity. It is not sentient; it does not breathe.

Ilyn Ross said...

Why is Reid in the US Senate? Because DARK-AGES warriors picked an anti separation of church and state, like Palin, to run against him.

Remember the dunghills who said that the female body can prevent a pregnancy in case of rape, and that rape is the will of their god.

Ilyn Ross said...

Why did God create the embryonic stage? Why do DARK-AGES warriors spurn it?

The human brainstem is fashioned around the 7th week of gestation and matures in a caudal to rostral arc thereby forming the medulla, pons, and midbrain. The medulla mediates arousal, breathing, heart rate, and gross movement of the body and head, and medullary functions appear prior to those of the pons which precede those of the midbrain. Hence, by the 9th gestational week the fetus will display spontaneous movements, one week later takes its FIRST BREATH...

http://brainmind.com/FetalBrainDevelopment.html

Ilyn Ross said...

A zygote/embryo is not a child. God created the embryonic stage, but DARK-AGES warriors spurn it. An embryo does not breathe. It is not sentient. It has no brain activity. Its central nervous system is not developed. One cannot kill that which has no brain activity.

"How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!" ~ Samuel Adams

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2009/11/purveyor-of-truth-part-1-definitions.html

Ilyn Ross said...

To birthers: have you adopted yet?

"Each year 14, 505, 000 [14.5 MILLION] children grow up as orphans and age out of the system by age sixteen. Each day 38,493 orphans age out. Every 2.2 seconds another orphan ages out with no family to belong to and no place to call home.

Studies have shown that 10% – 15% of these children commit suicide before they reach age eighteen. These studies also show that 60% of the girls become prostitutes and 70% of the boys become hardened criminals."

http://www.orphanhopeintl.org/facts-statistics/

Ilyn Ross said...

To birthers: have you adopted yet? "More than 100,000 children in the United States are in foster care waiting for permanent families."

http://photolisting.adoption.com/

Ilyn Ross said...

"Each year 14, 505, 000 [14.5 MILLION] children grow up as orphans and age out of the system by age sixteen. Each day 38,493 orphans age out. Every 2.2 seconds another orphan ages out with no family to belong to and no place to call home.

Studies have shown that 10% – 15% of these children commit suicide before they reach age eighteen. These studies also show that 60% of the girls become prostitutes and 70% of the boys become hardened criminals."

http://www.orphanhopeintl.org/facts-statistics/

"More than 100,000 children in the United States are in foster care waiting for permanent families."

http://photolisting.adoption.com/

Ilyn Ross said...

I advocate for life and choice. The pregnant girl has brain activity while the embryo does not.

The anti choice, the anti brain activity, do not hold that the life of the pregnant girl is sacred, nor her freedom to choose what to do with it.

Ilyn Ross said...

Girls forced to give up their babies http://www.divinecaroline.com/33/84887-baby-scoop-era-forced-give

Ilyn Ross said...

When I wrote that giving up one's baby is 24/7 torture for a lifetime, I did not know that there are MILLIONS of young girls who were FORCED to do so, as PUNISHMENT and for SUBSTANTIAL MONETARY benefits. Wishing a Mom to give up her baby reveals a monstrously cruel character, but doing it as punishment or for monetary gain is UTTERLY BARBARIC.

“Unwed mothers should be punished and they should be punished by taking their children away.”—Dr. Marion Hilliard of Women’s College Hospital, Daily Telegraph, (Toronto, November 1956)

"In the Baby Scoop Era, mothers were shamed into surrendering their children if born out of wedlock and given no choice at all.

“Illegitimacy is taboo in our society. A child born out of wedlock carries a stigma for life, while his unwed mother is often treated as a social outcast—an irresponsible, sexual delinquent who must be forced into seclusion as punishment for her flagrant violation of our most sacred principles.”

Forced by their own families into maternity homes, ostracized by society, denied employment and a place to live, mothers signed away their children because they were “bad girls.” There was no redemption, just secrecy and false stories “moving on” and “getting over it”....

After many years of making SUBSTANTIAL MONETARY benefits from the practice of adoption..."

Via http://www.divinecaroline.com/33/84887-baby-scoop-era-forced-give/2#ixzz2L9hFJ35z

Ilyn Ross said...

The pro-zygote are ANTI FREE WILL, the God-given human attribute. They are ANTI EMBRYONIC STAGE, the God-given window to change course, the stage when the unborn is not sentient, having no brain activity.

The pro-zygote crave to COERCE others to birth, COERCE others to give up their babies, COERCE others to fund orphanages... The advocacy of coercion is the MARK of EVIL. The pro-zygote CRAVE for ORGIES of COERCIONS.

Ilyn Ross said...

The pro-zygote are ANTI FREE WILL, the God-given human attribute. They are ANTI EMBRYONIC STAGE, the God-given window to change course, the stage when the unborn is not sentient, having no brain activity.

The pro-zygote crave to COERCE others to birth, COERCE others to give up their babies, COERCE others to fund orphanages... The advocacy of coercion is the MARK of EVIL. The pro-zygote CRAVE for ORGIES of COERCIONS.

When I wrote that giving up one's baby is 24/7 torture for a lifetime, I did not know that there are MILLIONS of young girls who were FORCED to do so, as PUNISHMENT and for SUBSTANTIAL MONETARY benefits. Wishing a Mom gives up her baby reveals a monstrously cruel character, but doing it as punishment or for monetary gain is UTTERLY BARBARIC.

http://www.divinecaroline.com/33/84887-baby-scoop-era-forced-give/2#ixzz2L9hFJ35z

Ilyn Ross said...

DARK-AGES warriors scream murder to justify their craving for orgies of coercions. The embryo does not breathe, so it cannot be stopped from breathing. It does not have brain activity, so it cannot be killed.

The pro-zygote crave to COERCE others to birth, COERCE others to give up their babies, COERCE others to fund orphanages... The advocacy of coercion is the MARK of EVIL. The pro-zygote CRAVE for ORGIES of COERCIONS.

Ilyn Ross said...

The embryo (up to 8 weeks) does not breathe, so it cannot be stopped from breathing. It does not have brain activity, so it cannot be killed.

"The human brainstem is fashioned around the 7th week of gestation and matures in a caudal to rostral arc thereby forming the medulla, pons, and midbrain. The medulla mediates arousal, breathing, heart rate, and gross movement of the body and head, and medullary functions appear prior to those of the pons which precede those of the midbrain. Hence, by the 9th gestational week the fetus will display spontaneous movements, one week later takes its FIRST BREATH..."

http://brainmind.com/FetalBrainDevelopment.html

Ilyn Ross said...

It is a scientific fact that in the case of a girl carrying an embryo: only one has brain activity: the pregnant girl.

I do find life and freedom sacred. That is why I passionately fight for LIFE and freedom.

Ilyn Ross said...

Behold these FIVE MILLION coercions, where substantial monetary benefits were involved.

"The Baby Scoop Era Was a Dark Time for Adoption - Usually defined as the period post WWII spanning until Roe vs. Wade, the Baby Scoop Era produced almost 5 million adoptees."

Via http://www.divinecaroline.com/33/84887-baby-scoop-era-forced-give#ixzz2LB3RPEqK

Ilyn Ross said...

Studies have shown that 10% – 15% of these children commit suicide before they reach age eighteen. These studies also show that 60% of the girls become prostitutes and 70% of the boys become hardened criminals."

http://www.orphanhopeintl.org/facts-statistics/

Ilyn Ross said...

Life begins at conception = The sun revolves around the Earth = ORGIES of COERCION

Ilyn Ross said...

On the 9th week, the central nervous system is developed. From this point, the fetus can have brain activity. On the 10th week, it takes its FIRST BREATH. After this, abortion will cause it to stop breathing. I hold that causing it to stop breathing, when not for health/disability reasons, is murder.

Ilyn Ross said...

Principles on Freedom are based on the laws of our being. "The principles on which we engaged, of which the charter of our independence is the record, were sanctioned by the LAWS of OUR BEING… Man [is] a rational animal, endowed by NATURE with rights… A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the LAWS of NATURE…” -- Thomas Jefferson

Ilyn Ross said...

When a person no longer has brain activity, the medical profession no longer considers him alive because he can no longer be revived.

I use the criterion for the cessation of life as the same criterion for the onset of life. It is consistent with what separates man from animals: the rational tool.

Ilyn Ross said...

The pregnant has brain activity. The zygote does not.

The pregnant has a central nervous system. The zygote does not.

The pregnant breathes. The zygote does not.

The pregnant is sentient. The zygote is not.

Ilyn Ross said...

It is as clear as a sunny day that the pregnant is an ACTUAL, while the zygote is a potential. It is as clear as crystal that the ACTUAL has rights. You want the actual to lose her rights in favor of the potential. This is anti rights, anti actual living human, anti freedom.

Ilyn Ross said...

Your method is to discount: The pregnant has brain activity. The zygote does not. The pregnant has a central nervous system. The zygote does not. The pregnant breathes. The zygote does not. The pregnant is sentient. The zygote is not. The zygote has no nose, no heart, no lungs.

ZOMBIE.

Ilyn Ross said...

Rights are ACTIONS that can be exercised without anyone's permission limited only by the equal rights of others. The zygote/embryo cannot perform any action. It is not sentient. Whereas, the fetus at 10 weeks, with a developed central nervous system, begins to breathe. This is an action that it can independently do. At this stage, it has the right to continue breathing, the right not to have its brain activity stopped.

Until then, the pregnant girl has the right to decide what do with everything in her body.

Ilyn Ross said...

You cannot kill a human with no brain activity. - Law of Causality

Ilyn Ross said...

Akin - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyY0zp_zFc4

Ilyn Ross said...

Mourdock - http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50133817n

Ilyn Ross said...

coerced moms - Www.exiledmothers.com

Ilyn Ross said...

God gifted man with FREE WILL. Choice. He created the embryonic stage, the window to change course, such that those who commit mistakes or the victims of rape will not suffer for a lifetime, together with the baby they bear.

Ilyn Ross said...

Evading the distinction between a zygote and a baby, the cavalier say, “Put the baby up for adoption.” They evince their monstrous cruelty: they do not care that giving up one’s baby is 24-7 torture for a lifetime.

www.exiledmothers.com

Ilyn Ross said...

Have you read the statements of Akin and Mourdock, the 2012 GOP primary winners?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/19/todd-akin-abortion-legitimate-rape_n_1807381.html

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/10/republican-senate-candidate-says-rape-pregnancies-are-gift-god/58282/

Ilyn Ross said...

The pregnant girl/woman DECIDES. That is not imposing abortion or non-abortion. That is FREEDOM.

The pregnant has brain activity. The zygote does not. The pregnant has a central nervous system. The zygote does not. The pregnant breathes. The zygote does not. The pregnant is sentient. The zygote is not.

The zygote has no brain activity, the criterion for human life. It has no brain. It is not sentient. It does not breathe. Whereas, the pregnant girl is an actual living human being. Yet, the pro-zygote, who tout “All life!”, blank out the life of a pregnant girl.

Ilyn Ross said...

Behold a DARK-AGES warrior!

The zygote has no brain, is not sentient, and does not breathe.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=567975633226827&set=a.178845238806537.45340.100000431863651&type=1&theater

Ilyn Ross said...

The pregnant has brain activity. The zygote does not. The pregnant has a central nervous system. The zygote does not. The pregnant breathes. The zygote does not. The pregnant is sentient. The zygote is not. The zygote has no nose, no heart, no lungs.

Rights are rights to ACTIONS. The pregnant can act, so she has rights. The embryo cannot act. It has no rights.

Ilyn Ross said...

Rand Paul lusts to COERCE young girls who get pregnant. Tyrant wannabe.

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2011/11/war-on-young-girls-and-on-science.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Behold a DARK-AGES warrior! Rand Paul lusts to COERCE young girls who get pregnant. Tyrant wannabe.

The zygote has no brain, is not sentient, and does not breathe.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=567975633226827&set=a.178845238806537.45340.100000431863651&type=1&theater

Ilyn Ross said...

Do you hold that one who has not taken a breath, who does not breathe, who has no brain activity is alive?

The cessation of human life is crystal: when brain activity stops. Reality and logic dictate that this is also the onset of human life: when brain activity is present. The zygote/embryo has no brain, no developed central nervous system. The embryo is not sentient; it does not breathe.

Ilyn Ross said...

I am against abortion when the unborn has brain activity, when it is sentient, when it can feel pain, when it breathes.

Based on the Law of Causality: one cannot have brain activity without a fully developed central nervous system [CNS]. An embryo does not have CNS. The CNS is fully developed on the 9th week, the start of the fetal stage. The fetus takes its first breath on the 10th week.

Ilyn Ross said...

"Rights as derived from the laws of nature... all men are created EQUAL & INDEPENDENT, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable, among which are the PRESERVATION of life..." - Thomas Jefferson

These words are universally applicable, even to abortion. A zygote is not equal to a girl; an embryo cannot do any independent action. Rights are rights to actions, like actions to preserve one's own life. An embryo does not breathe. The unborn takes its first breath at 10 weeks, a week after the central nervous system is formed. This is an independent action, especially since the placenta is formed from embryonic cells. One cannot breathe without brain activity. I hold that at this stage, the unborn is an actual living human, and has acquired rights.

"The principles on which we engaged, of which the charter of our independence is the record, were sanctioned by the laws of our being… Man [is] a rational animal, endowed by nature with rights… A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature…” -- Thomas Jefferson

TJ's version of the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable;
That all men are created equal & independent,
That from that equal creation
They derive rights inherent & inalienable,
Among which are the preservation of
Life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness…”

Ilyn Ross said...

Fighting for the right of a girl/woman to decide is fighting for actuals and for freedom.

Regarding abortion: God created the embryonic stage. Based on science, the embryo is not sentient; it does not breathe; it has no brain activity. It is not murder to abort. It is tyranny, it is COERCION, to ban abortion.

Ilyn Ross said...

Saying abortion is murder is of the DARK-AGES, lusting to COERCE others based on irrationality, based on malevolence, on monstrous cruelty.

"Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst." - Thomas Paine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=013aa1q6QgM

Ilyn Ross said...

Fighting for the right of a girl/woman to decide is fighting for actuals and for freedom.

Regarding abortion: God created the embryonic stage. Based on science, the embryo is not sentient; it does not breathe; it has no brain activity. It is not murder to abort. It is tyranny, it is COERCION, to ban abortion.

Ilyn Ross said...

The embryo cannot perform any action. It does not breathe, so how can it have the freedom to breathe? It is not yet an individual. Rights are for individuals. No one has a right to enslave. The embryo cannot render the pregnant slave.

Ilyn Ross said...

The embryonic stage is up to 8 weeks. No developed central nervous system, no brain activity, not sentient, does not breathe.

On the 9th week, the central nervous system is developed. From this point, the fetus can have brain activity. On the 10th week, it takes its FIRST BREATH. After this, abortion will cause it to stop breathing. I hold that causing it to stop breathing, when not for health/disability reasons, is murder.

"The human brainstem is fashioned around the 7th week of gestation and matures in a caudal to rostral arc thereby forming the medulla, pons, and midbrain. The medulla mediates arousal, breathing, heart rate, and gross movement of the body and head, and medullary functions appear prior to those of the pons which precede those of the midbrain. Hence, by the 9th gestational week the fetus will display spontaneous movements, one week later takes its FIRST BREATH..."

Ilyn Ross said...

I have not seen stats, but it is logical that unplanned pregnancies are prevalent among youngsters. When one makes mistakes, one does not lose the right to change course. It is evil to coerce anyone, to force one to birth and take care of another human. That is slavery. No one, not even an embryo, has the right to coerce, to force one to take an unchosen responsibility.

It is also unconscionable to impose irresponsible parents on a baby.

Ilyn Ross said...

Tyrant wannabes, DARK-AGES warriors, the anti ACTUAL living human, desire to COERCE YOUNG GIRLS into a lifetime of hardship. They seek the power to dictate to victims of rape and incest: Live with it!

One cannot murder that with no brain activity. One cannot kill that which has never taken a breath. An embryo is up to 8 weeks. It has no developed central nervous system, no brain activity, no sentience. It has never taken a breath.

"The human brainstem is fashioned around the 7th week of gestation and matures in a caudal to rostral arc thereby forming the medulla, pons, and midbrain. The medulla mediates arousal, breathing, heart rate, and gross movement of the body and head, and medullary functions appear prior to those of the pons which precede those of the midbrain. Hence, by the 9th gestational week the fetus will display spontaneous movements, one week later takes its FIRST BREATH..."

http://brainmind.com/FetalBrainDevelopment.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Are the brain-dead alive? NO. Does an embryo have brain activity? NO.

Ilyn Ross said...

Are the brain-dead alive? NO. Does an embryo have brain activity? NO. Is it murder to remove the life-support of that with no brain activity? No.

Is it of the DARK-AGES to spurn the embryonic stage? YES.

Ilyn Ross said...

Logic demands that the criterion for the cessation of actual-human-life is also the criterion for the onset of actual-human-life.

Are the brain-dead alive? NO. Does an embryo have brain activity? NO. Is it murder to remove the life-support of that with no brain activity? No.

Is it of the DARK-AGES to spurn the embryonic stage? YES.

Ilyn Ross said...

The true foundation of republican government is the equal right
of every citizen in his person and property and in their
management." --Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval, 1816.

Ilyn Ross said...

When a person stops growing, he/she does not lose rights. So, growth cannot be the basis of rights. Logic demands that the criterion for the cessation of actual-human-life is also the criterion for the onset of actual-human-life.

Are the brain-dead alive? NO. Does an embryo have brain activity? NO. Is it murder to remove the life-support of that with no brain activity? No.

Is it of the DARK-AGES to spurn the embryonic stage? YES.

Ilyn Ross said...

No human has the right to enslave another. The potential, like an embryo, has no right to enslave an actual, like the pregnant girl.

Ilyn Ross said...

An embryo is not a child. Tyrant wannabes pervert words in order to coerce. The free choose their own responsibilities. If the pregnant does not have a choice, it is slavery.

Ilyn Ross said...

When a pregnant girl does not choose abortion prior to the onset of brain activity, then she has CHOSEN to be responsible for the unborn until it reaches adulthood. CHOICE is the difference between slavery and freedom.

Ilyn Ross said...

CHOICE is the difference between slavery and freedom.

Ilyn Ross said...

"equal & independent" - The embryo is not equal to and independent from the pregnant girl.

“We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable;
That all men are created equal & independent,
That from that equal creation
They derive rights inherent & inalienable,
Among which are the preservation of
Life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness…”

Ilyn Ross said...

One who blanks out the life of the pregnant and who champions destroying the life of an actual human being – is certainly not pro-life. One who advocates force – advocates forcing a human being to go through a lifetime paying for a mistake – does not cherish the sanctity of life. One who imposes a tortured life on another is a monster.

A zygote is not a baby.

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2009/11/purveyor-of-truth-part-1-definitions.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Law of Causality: There can be no brain activity without a developed central nervous system. There can be no heartbeat without brain activity.

"The human brainstem is fashioned around the 7th week of gestation and matures in a caudal to rostral arc thereby forming the medulla, pons, and midbrain. The medulla mediates arousal, breathing, heart rate, and gross movement of the body and head, and medullary functions appear prior to those of the pons which precede those of the midbrain. Hence, by the 9th gestational week the fetus will display spontaneous movements, one week later takes its FIRST BREATH..."

http://brainmind.com/FetalBrainDevelopment.html

Ilyn Ross said...

No one has a right to coerce the pregnant. Not even her embryo. CHOICE is the difference between freedom and slavery.

"Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst." - Thomas Paine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=013aa1q6QgM

Ilyn Ross said...

What kind creates fallible beings with sexual urges, even the young ones, and punishes them for a lifetime for making mistakes? What kind furthers the pain of rape victims? The CRUEL kind. The MALEVOLENT.

"Belief in a cruel God makes a cruel man." - Thomas Paine

Ilyn Ross said...

Evading the distinction between a zygote and a baby, the cavalier say, “Put the baby up for adoption.” They evince their monstrous cruelty: they do not care that giving up one’s baby is 24-7 torture for a lifetime.

The embryo, having no brain activity, cannot be murdered.

Ilyn Ross said...

To claim that a potential has rights is to enslave the actual.

A girl does not lose rights by getting pregnant. Pregnancy does not make one a slave, not even of one's own embryo.

A pregnant girl/woman has a right to decide. Free humans choose their responsibilities.

Ilyn Ross said...

"equal & independent" - The embryo is not equal to and independent from the pregnant girl. The pregnant has brain activity. The embryo does not. The pregnant has a central nervous system. The embryo does not. The pregnant breathes. The embryo does not. The pregnant is sentient. The embryo is not.

“We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable;
That all men are created equal & independent,
That from that equal creation
They derive rights inherent & inalienable,
Among which are the preservation of
Life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness…”

Ilyn Ross said...

See the Law of Identity and the Law of Causality here. They are axioms.

Based on the Law of Identity: An embryo is not an actual living human.
Based on the Law of Causality: One with no developed central nervous system, like an embryo, cannot have brain activity.

http://www.importanceofphilosophy.com/Metaphysics_Causality.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death." Freedom or life.

DARK-AGES warriors have no respect for freedom/choice, and they seek to destroy the life of an actual living human.

Ilyn Ross said...

The anti gay are an abomination.

"Belief in a cruel God makes a cruel man.... Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst." - Thomas Paine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=013aa1q6QgM

Ilyn Ross said...

There can be no heartbeat separate from the pregnant girl/woman without a heart and without brain activity. An embryo, which is up to 8 weeks, does not have a developed central nervous system. It has no brain activity. It is not sentient. It does not breathe.

Ilyn Ross said...

Before the third month, the pregnant girl/woman decides whether to take on the responsibility of taking care of another human. DARK-AGES warriors lust to take away that foundation of freedom: choice. Free humans choose their responsibilities. Without choice one is a slave. No one, not even an embryo, has the right to enslave.

Ilyn Ross said...

There can be no heartbeat separate from the pregnant girl's/woman's without a heart and without brain activity. An embryo, which is up to 8 weeks, does not have a developed central nervous system. It has no brain activity. It is not sentient. It does not breathe.

Ilyn Ross said...

In Margaret Sanger's time, dissemination of information about contraception was prohibited by federal anti-obscenity laws. Contraception was illegal! "Sanger's efforts contributed to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case which legalized contraception in the United States."

Those who demonize her are utterly EVIL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger

Ilyn Ross said...

“Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness, with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we called it the word of a demon than the Word of God. It is a history of wickedness that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind.” - Thomas Paine

Ilyn Ross said...

“Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness, with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we called it the word of a demon than the Word of God. It is a history of wickedness that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind.” - Thomas Paine

Six days before the Crossing, on December 19, Thomas Paine's The American Crisis was published. On December 23, General Washington had it read to his troops, who suffered great privations including blankets. Thomas Paine's words fueled uncommon souls:

“These are the times that try men's souls; the summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”

The anti gay are an abomination.

"Belief in a cruel God makes a cruel man.... Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst." - Thomas Paine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=013aa1q6QgM

Ilyn Ross said...

This one is gay. Delight in bashing him, you satanic gay bashers.

Alan Turing, an outstanding human who broke the Enigma code and saved his country and the world from the Nazis, was persecuted by the country he saved because homosexuality was illegal, driving him to commit suicide.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Turing

Ilyn Ross said...

One who has renounced God's greatest gift, reason, has chosen to become subhuman.

Spurning your God-given reason is of the Dark-Ages.

"Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous." - Thomas Jefferson

Ilyn Ross said...

It is blasphemy to ascribe gay bashing to God.

Ilyn Ross said...

God is so good that He has given each human reason, that every human can become independent and happy. But those with no self-esteem, those who spurn individuality and independence, spurn God's gift.

One who does not use reason has chosen to become subhuman.

Ilyn Ross said...



Ilyn Ross

about a minute ago near Piscataway

.



"equal & independent" - The embryo is not equal to nor independent from the pregnant girl. The pregnant has brain activity. The embryo does not. The pregnant has a central nervous system. The embryo does not. The pregnant breathes. The embryo does not. The pregnant is sentient. The embryo is not.

“We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable;
That all men are created equal & independent,
That from that equal creation
They derive rights inherent & inalienable,
Among which are the preservation of
Life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness…”

Ilyn Ross said...

Gay bashers have blood on their hands -

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/rutgers-freshman-kills-classmates-hidden-camera-watch-sexual-activity-sources-article-1.438225

Ilyn Ross said...

A zygote/embryo has no right to enslave a pregnant girl/woman. No one has a right to enslave.

Ilyn Ross said...

Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death." Freedom over life.

DARK-AGES warriors have no respect for freedom/choice, and they seek to destroy the life of an actual living human.

Ilyn Ross said...

An embryo has no developed central nervous system [CNS]. Basic rationality based on the Law of Causality: there can be no brain activity without a developed CNS. Tyrant wannabes spurn definitions. One with no brain activity cannot be murdered. The anti reason, anti actual human, lust to ban ALL abortions.

Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death." Freedom over life. DARK-AGES warriors have no respect for freedom/choice, and they seek to destroy the life of an actual living human.

Ilyn Ross said...

An embryo has no developed central nervous system [CNS]. This is basic rationality based on the Law of Causality: there can be no brain activity without a developed CNS. Tyrant wannabes spurn definitions. One with no brain activity cannot be murdered. The anti reason, anti actual human, lust to ban ALL abortions.

Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death." Freedom over life. DARK-AGES warriors have no respect for freedom/choice, and they seek to destroy the life of an actual living human.

Ilyn Ross said...

An embryo has no developed central nervous system [CNS]. This is basic rationality based on the Law of Causality: there can be no brain activity without a developed CNS. Tyrant wannabes spurn definitions. One with no brain activity cannot be murdered. The anti reason, anti actual human, lust to ban ALL abortions.

Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death." Freedom over life. DARK-AGES warriors have no respect for freedom/choice, and they seek to destroy the life of an actual living human.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=357889420977902&set=a.277772722322906.49371.277771632323015&type=1&theater

Ilyn Ross said...

What bonds people who revere a book that says killing infidels, like Americans or Jews, is not murder but a pathway to heaven, and people who revere a book that says homosexuality is an abomination? The renunciation of reason.

Ilyn Ross said...

The zygote has no bodily parts. The zygote is not a child.

"How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!" ~ Samuel Adams

Ilyn Ross said...

Destroyers insidiously attack definitions. The destruction trick is also employed by the anti-choice movement, describing itself as pro-life. It negates life and justice by using the term murder in relation to that with no brain activity. One who blanks out the life of the pregnant and who champions destroying the life of an actual human being – is certainly not pro-life. One who advocates force – advocates forcing a human being to go through a lifetime paying for a mistake – does not cherish the sanctity of life. One who imposes a tortured life on another is a monster.

http://ilynross.blogspot.com/2009/11/purveyor-of-truth-part-1-definitions.html

Ilyn Ross said...

No one, not even a zygote nor an embryo, has the right to enslave. The pregnant has the right to choose whether to change course or not.

Ilyn Ross said...

Cells have no rights. Masturbation is not mass murder. The issue is individual rights. Only ACTUAL living humans have a right to preserve their own lives.

Ilyn Ross said...

Have you convinced yourself that you can hold that the embryo is more valuable than an actual living human, and at the same time not violate the rights of young girls and women? That takes a lot of evasion.

Ilyn Ross said...

It is of the DARK-AGES to:

* Evade that the embryo is not a child;
* Evade that the embryo has no brain activity, and can never have brain activity because it has no developed central nervous system;
* To claim that it is murder to remove the life-support system of one with no brain activity.

Ilyn Ross said...

No one, not even a zygote nor an embryo, has the right to enslave. The pregnant girl has the right to choose whether to change course or not.

Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death." Freedom over life. DARK-AGES warriors have no respect for freedom/choice, and they seek to destroy the life of an actual living human.

An embryo has no developed central nervous system [CNS]. This is basic rationality based on the Law of Causality: there can be no brain activity without a developed CNS. Tyrant wannabes spurn definitions. One with no brain activity cannot be murdered. The anti reason, anti actual human, lust to ban ALL abortions.

Ilyn Ross said...

It is of the DARK-AGES to:

* Evade that an embryo is not a child;
* Evade that an embryo has no brain activity, and can never have brain activity because it has no developed central nervous system;
* To claim that it is murder to remove the life-support system of one with no brain activity.

Ilyn Ross said...

An embryo is not a child. To claim so is to lust to tyrannize based on the DARK-AGES.

Ilyn Ross said...

DARK-AGES warriors lust to ban ALL abortions. They are so anti science, anti truth, they are of no help to the unborn with brain activity.

Ilyn Ross said...

I advocate for life and choice. The pregnant girl has brain activity while the embryo does not.

The anti choice, the anti brain activity, do not hold that the life of the pregnant girl is sacred, nor her freedom to choose what to do with it.

Ilyn Ross said...

Karen Bavouset I am sick of this anti-planned parenthood crap that involves only men. None of you are old enough to remember or know what women went through prior to the mid 80's. We had to ask permission from our spouses, and get it in writing for the doctor, to take birth control pills, have a hysterectomy for any reason including medical, have a tubal ligation for any reason including medical. If a woman were single, we could not get a prescription for birth control pills - period.

Even if a woman needed an abortion for life threatening medical reasons she could not have one in most states. So, they went to midwives in back alleys or traveled to the states who did allow them but the facilities were dire and there were many deaths of the women anyway, as a result of unsanitary conditions or doctors and staff who did not care about the patient.

The government should not pay for abortions but abortions and birth control should not be outlawed. Every woman has a right to choose what is best for her whether you agree or not. It is not your business if a person chooses to do anything with or to their own body as long as you do not pay for it.

Ilyn Ross said...

Just as tyrant wannabes MALEVOLENTLY LIE about Thomas Jefferson, they do so also against Sanger. DARK-AGES warriors.

In Margaret Sanger's time, dissemination of information about contraception was prohibited by federal anti-obscenity laws. Contraception was illegal! "Sanger's efforts contributed to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case which legalized contraception in the United States."

Those who demonize her are utterly EVIL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger

Ilyn Ross said...

Offense against ACTUAL living humans based on irrationality. You want to IMPOSE a TORTURED life, both on a mother and child, based on what is contrary to science.

Ilyn Ross said...

The zygote has no bodily parts. The zygote is not an infant. It is not a child.

"How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!" ~ Samuel Adams

Ilyn Ross said...

I advocate for life and choice. The pregnant girl has brain activity while the embryo does not. The anti choice, the anti brain activity, do not hold that the life of the pregnant girl is sacred, nor her freedom to choose what to do with it.

No one, not even a zygote nor an embryo, has the right to enslave. The pregnant girl has the right to choose whether to change course or not.

Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death." Freedom over life. DARK-AGES warriors have no respect for freedom/choice, and they seek to destroy the life of an actual living human.

Ilyn Ross said...

Those who hold that pregnant girls/women are rightless, who do not have the right to change course, are evil.

Ilyn Ross said...

Those who hold that pregnant girls/women are rightless are evil. Those who hold that pregnant girls/women have no right to change course are anti freedom, anti actual living humans.

Ilyn Ross said...

The pregnant girl has brain activity while the embryo does not. The anti girl are anti life and anti freedom.

Ilyn Ross said...

An embryo is not a baby. Tyrant wannabes murder definitions in their lust to COERCE pregnant girls.

Ilyn Ross said...

This is how evil the anti gay are -

Alan Turing, an outstanding human who broke the Enigma code and saved his country and the world from the Nazis, was persecuted by the country he saved because homosexuality was illegal, driving him to commit suicide.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Turing

Ilyn Ross said...

Embryos do not have brain activity. DARK-AGES warriors dehumanize pregnant girls, so they can COERCE and TORTURE them for life, including the babies they bear.

Ilyn Ross said...

The vitriol against Sanger is evil. LIES!

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/sanger-hitler_equation.html

Ilyn Ross said...

One who posted vitriolic LIES against Sanger replied when I asked if he is against the birth control pill: "I'm in favor of suggesting to women who don't want to get pregnant that they should keep their legs closed."

Sanger's EXALTED accomplishments: In Margaret Sanger's time, dissemination of information about contraception was prohibited by federal anti-obscenity laws. Contraception was illegal! "Sanger's efforts contributed to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case which legalized contraception in the United States."

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/sanger-hitler_equation.html

Ilyn Ross said...

So many spread VITRIOLIC LIES [debunked in the linked study] about one who has gained freedom for girls and women, and for all. Imagine her world where contraceptives were illegal, and to talk about them was a crime!

One who posted vitriolic LIES against Sanger replied when I asked if he is against the birth control pill: "I'm in favor of suggesting to women who don't want to get pregnant that they should keep their legs closed."

Sanger's EXALTED accomplishments: In Margaret Sanger's time, dissemination of information about contraception was prohibited by federal anti-obscenity laws. Contraception was illegal! "Sanger's efforts contributed to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case which legalized contraception in the United States."

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/sanger-hitler_equation.html

Ilyn Ross said...

So many spread VITRIOLIC LIES [debunked in the linked study] about one who gained freedom for girls and women, and for all. Imagine her world where contraceptives were illegal, and to talk about them was a crime!

One who posted vitriolic LIES against Sanger replied when I asked if he is against the birth control pill: "I'm in favor of suggesting to women who don't want to get pregnant that they should keep their legs closed."

Sanger's EXALTED accomplishments: In Margaret Sanger's time, dissemination of information about contraception was prohibited by federal anti-obscenity laws. Contraception was illegal! "Sanger's efforts contributed to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case which legalized contraception in the United States."

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/sanger-hitler_equation.html

Ilyn Ross said...

There can be no bodily function without brain activity. The embryo [up to 8 weeks] does not have a developed central nervous system [CNS]. Based on basic rationality, the Law of Causality, there can be no brain activity without a developed CNS. Without brain activity, there are no bodily functions, like a beating heart. The embryo is not an ACTUAL LIVING INDIVIDUAL. It has no rights.

Each individual has rights. Rights are limited only by the equal rights of others. You have no right to impose anything on anyone. Each pregnant girl/woman has the right to change course.

No one, not even an embryo, has to right to enslave. The pregnant girl has the right to decide.

Ilyn Ross said...

Sanger fought for free speech, for the right to the pursuit of happiness! Exalted.

Ilyn Ross said...

The anti abortion pill, little males wanting to enslave women, spew vitriolic lies against Sanger, who succeeded in having contraceptives legal in a world where it was a crime to talk about them.

Ilyn Ross said...

lies of little women-enslaver wannabes

Ilyn Ross said...

If you achieve this, the anti birth control pill, those lusting to OWN women, demonize you: In Margaret Sanger's time, dissemination of information about contraception was prohibited by federal anti-obscenity laws. Contraception was illegal! "Sanger's efforts contributed to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case which legalized contraception in the United States."

Ilyn Ross said...

If you achieved this, the anti birth control pill, those lusting to OWN women, demonize you: In Margaret Sanger's time, dissemination of information about contraception was prohibited by federal anti-obscenity laws. Contraception was illegal! "Sanger's efforts contributed to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case which legalized contraception in the United States."

Ilyn Ross said...

Margaret Sanger fought for free speech, for the right to talk about contraceptives, and succeeded. EXALTED. She fought for the legalization of contraceptives and she won. This freed women, and the young. EXALTED. SANGER FREED WOMEN FROM BEING BREEDERS. GLORIOUS.

Those lusting to OWN women hate her work. They associate it with evil. EVIL.

Ilyn Ross said...

Law of Causality: There can be no brain activity without a developed central nervous system. There can be no heartbeat separate from the pregnant girl's/woman's without a heart and without brain activity. An embryo, which is up to 8 weeks, does not have a developed central nervous system. It has no brain activity. It is not sentient. It does not breathe.

"The human brainstem is fashioned around the 7th week of gestation and matures in a caudal to rostral arc thereby forming the medulla, pons, and midbrain. The medulla mediates arousal, breathing, heart rate, and gross movement of the body and head, and medullary functions appear prior to those of the pons which precede those of the midbrain. Hence, by the 9th gestational week the fetus will display spontaneous movements, one week later takes its FIRST BREATH..."

http://brainmind.com/FetalBrainDevelopment.html

Ilyn Ross said...

The anti gay have blood on their hands for the tyrannies that gays have suffered, are suffering, and will suffer.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/rutgers-freshman-kills-classmates-hidden-camera-watch-sexual-activity-sources-article-1.438225

Ilyn Ross said...

The anti-gay hide behind 8-year-olds in their LUST to COERCE. Little tyrant wannabes. I do not teach my young BIGOTRY nor TYRANNY.

I am against censorship. "Censorship is telling a man he can’t have a steak just because a baby can’t chew it.” - Mark Twain

"Errors of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.... We are bound, you, I, and every one to make common cause, even with error itself, to maintain the common right of freedom of conscience." - Thomas Jefferson

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1dUj6nOcQdw

Ilyn Ross said...

Hitler et al never fought for freedoms. Sanger fought a world where it is a crime to talk about contraceptives, a crime to use them. We enjoy these freedoms.

Many wantonly spew vitriol at Sanger without proof.

Ilyn Ross said...

Here is a list of Sanger's writings, speeches, diaries, and correspondence. Where did she promote the genocide of any race?

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/aboutms/ms_writings.html

Innocent until proven guilty. She was not convicted when she was alive. Those demonizing her now, without proof, are EVIL.

Ilyn Ross said...

Library on Congress on Sanger -

http://findingaids.loc.gov/db/search/xq/searchMfer02.xq?_id=loc.mss.eadmss.ms998010&_faSection=overview&_faSubsection=did&_dmdid=

Ilyn Ross said...

It is a fact that it was a federal crime to talk about contraception. Sanger succeeded in ending that law. GLORIOUS. It is a fact that it was a federal crime to use contraception. Sanger succeeded in ending that law. EXALTED.

The capitalized words are my opinions. The others are reality.

It is my opinion, too, that those who demonized the very dead Sanger, without proof, are EVIL.

Ilyn Ross said...


It is a fact that it was a federal crime to talk about contraception. Sanger succeeded in ending that law. GLORIOUS. It is a fact that it was a federal crime to use contraception. Sanger succeeded in ending that law. EXALTED.

The capitalized words are my opinions. The others are reality. It is my opinion, too, that those who demonized the very dead Sanger, without proof, are EVIL.

Here is a list of Sanger papers. Please point to the document proving that Sanger advocated for the extermination of races.

http://findingaids.loc.gov/db/search/xq/searchMfer02.xq?_id=loc.mss.eadmss.ms998010&_faSection=overview&_faSubsection=did&_dmdid

Ilyn Ross said...


It is a fact that it was a federal crime to talk about contraception. Sanger succeeded in ending that law. GLORIOUS. It is a fact that it was a federal crime to use contraception. Sanger succeeded in ending that law. EXALTED.

The capitalized words are my opinions. The others are reality. It is my opinion, too, that those who demonize the very dead Sanger, without proof, are EVIL.

Here is a list of Sanger papers. Please point to the document proving that Sanger advocated for the extermination of races.

http://findingaids.loc.gov/db/search/xq/searchMfer02.xq?_id=loc.mss.eadmss.ms998010&_faSection=overview&_faSubsection=did&_dmdid

Ilyn Ross said...

What is your position on a pregnant girl's/woman's right to choose, on the birth control pill, on the morning/week-after pills?

Ilyn Ross said...

This is evidence that those who demonize Sanger are DISHONEST and EVIL.

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/demonization_of_ms.html

Ilyn Ross said...

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/demonization_of_ms.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Logic is non-contradictory identification within the FULL context of one's knowledge. As it is evil for NBC to edit the George Zimmerman 9-11 tape, it is also evil to drop context in Sanger's case, as in any case.

NBC dropped sentences, reporting that Zimmerman said, "This guy looks like he's up to no good. He looks black." But, the full context is this: "This guy looks like he's up to no good. Or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about." Then the dispatcher asked, "O.K., and this guy — is he white, black or Hispanic?" To which Zimmerman replied, "He looks black."

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/demonization_of_ms.html

Ilyn Ross said...

"As late as 1960, the American legal system was not hospitable to the idea of birth control. Thirty states had statutes on the books prohibiting or restricting the sale and advertisement of contraception. These laws stretched back almost a century, reflecting an underlying American belief that contraception was lewd, immoral and promoted promiscuity."

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevents/e_comstock.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Comstock's Crusade
The driving force behind the original anti-birth control statutes was a New Yorker named Anthony Comstock. Born in rural Connecticut in 1844, Comstock served in the infantry during the Civil War, then moved to New York City and found work as a salesman. A devout Christian, he was appalled by what he saw in the city's streets. It seemed to him that the town was teeming with prostitutes and pornography. In the late 1860s, Comstock began supplying the police with information for raids on sex trade merchants and came to prominence with his anti-obscenity crusade. Also offended by explicit advertisements for birth control devices, he soon identified the contraceptive industry as one of his targets. Comstock was certain that the availability of contraceptives alone promoted lust and lewdness.

Making Birth Control a Federal Crime
In 1872 Comstock set off for Washington with an anti-obscenity bill, including a ban on contraceptives, that he had drafted himself. On March 3, 1873, Congress passed the new law, later known as the Comstock Act. The statute defined contraceptives as obscene and illicit, making it a federal offense to disseminate birth control through the mail or across state lines.

Public Support for Comstock Laws
This statute was the first of its kind in the Western world, but at the time, the American public did not pay much attention to the new law. Anthony Comstock was jubilant over his legislative victory. Soon after the federal law was on the books, twenty-four states enacted their own versions of Comstock laws to restrict the contraceptive trade on a state level.

The Most Restrictive States
New England residents lived under the most restrictive laws in the country. In Massachusetts, anyone disseminating contraceptives -- or information about contraceptives -- faced stiff fines and imprisonment. But by far the most restrictive state of all was Connecticut, where the act of using birth control was even prohibited by law. Married couples could be arrested for using birth control in the privacy of their own bedrooms, and subjected to a one-year prison sentence. In actuality, law enforcement agents often looked the other way when it came to anti-birth control laws, but the statutes remained on the books.

Sanger's Crusade
These laws remained unchallenged until birth-control advocate Margaret Sanger made it her mission to challenge the Comstock Act. The first successful change in the laws came from Sanger's 1916 arrest for opening the first birth control clinic in America. The case that grew out of her arrest resulted in the 1918 Crane decision, which allowed women to use birth control for therapeutic purposes.

Changing Laws for Changing Times
The next amendment of the Comstock Laws came with the 1936 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision, United States v. One Package. The decision made it possible for doctors to distribute contraceptives across state lines. This time Margaret Sanger had been instrumental in maneuvering behind the scenes to bring the matter before the court. While this decision did not eliminate the problem of the restrictive "chastity laws" on the state level, it was a crucial ruling. Physicians could now legally mail birth control devices and information throughout the country, paving the way for the legitimization of birth control by the medical industry and the general public.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevents/e_comstock.html

Ilyn Ross said...

There are wielders of legal coercive power who crave to make homosexuality a crime - Republicans propose to make it illegal to be gay in Montana

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/09/18/republicans-propose-make-illegal-gay-montana/

There are anti-gay bullies, and some homosexuals have committed suicide -

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/rutgers-freshman-kills-classmates-hidden-camera-watch-sexual-activity-sources-article-1.438225

Alan Turing, an outstanding human who broke the Enigma code and helped saved his country and the world from the Nazis, was persecuted by the country he saved because homosexuality was illegal, driving him to commit suicide.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Turing

Ilyn Ross said...

I agree that abortion after the onset of brain activity, when the fetus breathes, on the 10th week, if not about life-death health issues, is murder.

Ilyn Ross said...

The embryo has no brain activity; the pregnant being has. The embryo does not breathe; the pregnant being does. The embryo is not sentient; the pregnant being is.

The embryo has no rights. The pregnant being has.

Ilyn Ross said...

The embryonic stage is up to 8 weeks. The central nervous system is fully developed on the 9th week. The fetus takes its first breath on the 10th.

I hold that on the 10th week, the unborn has acquired rights.

Ilyn Ross said...

The pregnant girl has brain activity, while the embryo does not. The pregnant girl is sentient, while the embryo is not. The pregnant girl breathes, while the embryo does not. The anti abortion believe in a cruel god - they delude themselves - they have no respect for life.

Ilyn Ross said...

Gay bashers have blood on their hands -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_violence_against_LGBT_people_in_the_United_States

Ilyn Ross said...

Those who demonize Sanger, malevolently out of context, are of the Dark-Ages.

http://www.bartleby.com/1013/5.html - Margaret Sanger (1879–1966). Woman and the New Race. 1920. V. The Wickedness of Creating Large Families

http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm

Ilyn Ross said...

http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm

http://www.bartleby.com/1013/5.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Sanger is being subjected to the same level of vitriol directed at Thomas Jefferson, where all contexts are dropped. Thou shall not bear false witness...

Ilyn Ross said...

In Sanger's time, using and TALKING about contraceptives are crimes. She fought and succeeded in ending such laws.

Ilyn Ross said...

The DARK-AGES - "As late as 1960, the American legal system was not hospitable to the idea of birth control. Thirty states had statutes on the books prohibiting or restricting the sale and advertisement of contraception. These laws stretched back almost a century, reflecting an underlying American belief that contraception was lewd, immoral and promoted promiscuity."

http://www.pbs.org/.../pill/peopleevents/e_comstock.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Comstock's Crusade
The driving force behind the original anti-birth control statutes was a New Yorker named Anthony Comstock. Born in rural Connecticut in 1844, Comstock served in the infantry during the Civil War, then moved to New York City and found work as a salesman. A devout Christian, he was appalled by what he saw in the city's streets. It seemed to him that the town was teeming with prostitutes and pornography. In the late 1860s, Comstock began supplying the police with information for raids on sex trade merchants and came to prominence with his anti-obscenity crusade. Also offended by explicit advertisements for birth control devices, he soon identified the contraceptive industry as one of his targets. Comstock was certain that the availability of contraceptives alone promoted lust and lewdness.

Ilyn Ross said...

Making Birth Control a Federal Crime
In 1872 Comstock set off for Washington with an anti-obscenity bill, including a ban on contraceptives, that he had drafted himself. On March 3, 1873, Congress passed the new law, later known as the Comstock Act. The statute defined contraceptives as obscene and illicit, making it a federal offense to disseminate birth control through the mail or across state lines.

Ilyn Ross said...

Those who demonize Sanger are on the side of Comstock -

Making Birth Control a Federal Crime - In 1872 Comstock set off for Washington with an anti-obscenity bill, including a ban on contraceptives, that he had drafted himself. On March 3, 1873, Congress passed the new law, later known as the Comstock Act. The statute defined contraceptives as obscene and illicit, making it a federal offense to disseminate birth control through the mail or across state lines.

Ilyn Ross said...

Public Support for Comstock Laws
This statute was the first of its kind in the Western world, but at the time, the American public did not pay much attention to the new law. Anthony Comstock was jubilant over his legislative victory. Soon after the federal law was on the books, twenty-four states enacted their own versions of Comstock laws to restrict the contraceptive trade on a state level.

Ilyn Ross said...

The Most Restrictive States
New England residents lived under the most restrictive laws in the country. In Massachusetts, anyone disseminating contraceptives -- or information about contraceptives -- faced stiff fines and imprisonment. But by far the most restrictive state of all was Connecticut, where the act of using birth control was even prohibited by law. Married couples could be arrested for using birth control in the privacy of their own bedrooms, and subjected to a one-year prison sentence. In actuality, law enforcement agents often looked the other way when it came to anti-birth control laws, but the statutes remained on the books.

Ilyn Ross said...

Sanger's Crusade
These laws remained unchallenged until birth-control advocate Margaret Sanger made it her mission to challenge the Comstock Act. The first successful change in the laws came from Sanger's 1916 arrest for opening the first birth control clinic in America. The case that grew out of her arrest resulted in the 1918 Crane decision, which allowed women to use birth control for therapeutic purposes.

Ilyn Ross said...

Changing Laws for Changing Times
The next amendment of the Comstock Laws came with the 1936 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision, United States v. One Package. The decision made it possible for doctors to distribute contraceptives across state lines. This time Margaret Sanger had been instrumental in maneuvering behind the scenes to bring the matter before the court. While this decision did not eliminate the problem of the restrictive "chastity laws" on the state level, it was a crucial ruling. Physicians could now legally mail birth control devices and information throughout the country, paving the way for the legitimization of birth control by the medical industry and the general public.

http://www.pbs.org/.../pill/peopleevents/e_comstock.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Changing Laws for Changing Times
The next amendment of the Comstock Laws came with the 1936 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision, United States v. One Package. The decision made it possible for doctors to distribute contraceptives across state lines. This time Margaret Sanger had been instrumental in maneuvering behind the scenes to bring the matter before the court. While this decision did not eliminate the problem of the restrictive "chastity laws" on the state level, it was a crucial ruling. Physicians could now legally mail birth control devices and information throughout the country, paving the way for the legitimization of birth control by the medical industry and the general public.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevents/e_comstock.html

Ilyn Ross said...

"Margaret Sanger's name is virtually synonymous with the development of birth control, a term she helped coin in 1914. Schooled in the pre-World War I activism of the radical labor left and mobilized by her work as a home nurse in the immigrant ghettos of New York, Margaret Sanger (1879-1966) became convinced that in liberating women from the tyranny of unwanted pregnancies, birth control would effect fundamental change. From the publication of The Woman Rebel in 1914 through her leadership of the International Planned Parenthood Federation in the 1950s Margaret Sanger dedicated herself to making birth control safe, effective, legal, and socially sanctioned. Birth control today remains a key component of social and economic change, and continues to be surrounded by controversies and debates at whose center lie the policies developed and publicized by Margaret Sanger."

http://history.as.nyu.edu/object/history.editingprojects.margaretsanger

Ilyn Ross said...

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/

Ilyn Ross said...

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/newsletter/articles/sanger_gagged.html

Ilyn Ross said...

Here is Anthony Comstock -

http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2012/02/anthony-comstock-american-prude

Ilyn Ross said...

http://www.expo98.msu.edu/people/comstock.htm

HARPER�S WEEKLY

May 22, 1915

Birth Control and Public Morals: An Interview with Anthony Comstock

Ilyn Ross said...

Aside from ending laws against speech, conscience, and happiness, Sanger worked part time with the Visiting Nurses Association in the immigrant ghettos of NY's Lower East Side.

http://www.thenation.com/article/166121/awakenings-margaret-sanger

Ilyn Ross said...

When I wrote that giving up one's baby is 24/7 torture for a lifetime, I did not know that there are MILLIONS of young girls who were FORCED to do so, as PUNISHMENT and for SUBSTANTIAL MONETARY benefits. Wishing a Mom to give up her baby reveals a monstrously cruel character, but doing it as punishment or for monetary gain is UTTERLY BARBARIC.

“Unwed mothers should be punished and they should be punished by taking their children away.”—Dr. Marion Hilliard of Women’s College Hospital, Daily Telegraph, (Toronto, November 1956)

"In the Baby Scoop Era, mothers were shamed into surrendering their children if born out of wedlock and given no choice at all.

“Illegitimacy is taboo in our society. A child born out of wedlock carries a stigma for life, while his unwed mother is often treated as a social outcast—an irresponsible, sexual delinquent who must be forced into seclusion as punishment for her flagrant violation of our most sacred principles.”

Forced by their own families into maternity homes, ostracized by society, denied employment and a place to live, mothers signed away their children because they were “bad girls.” There was no redemption, just secrecy and false stories “moving on” and “getting over it”....

After many years of making SUBSTANTIAL MONETARY benefits from the practice of adoption..."

http://www.divinecaroline.com/life-etc/culture-causes/baby-scoop-era-women-forced-give-their-babies